SOUND declares the DOUBLE SLIT Experiment is a SHAM

Beyond the boundaries of established science an avalanche of exotic ideas compete for our attention. Experts tell us that these ideas should not be permitted to take up the time of working scientists, and for the most part they are surely correct. But what about the gems in the rubble pile? By what ground-rules might we bring extraordinary new possibilities to light?

Moderators: MGmirkin, bboyer

Locked
Valhalla
Guest

SOUND declares the DOUBLE SLIT Experiment is a SHAM

Unread post by Valhalla » Fri Nov 28, 2008 7:59 am

I propose a simple alteration to the experiment, because it has become quite clear that the empirical scientist has failed to account for the apparent SOUND waves that have been present in their laboratories when they started opening slits and bouncing light off mirrors...
They failed to perform a proper exorcism and create a laboratory that was like the vacuum, they failed to recreate the vacuum that they proposed was in outer space.
With their primitive detection equipment they could not detect the luminiferous aether/plasma/dark matter/dark energy, this has become apparently true.
Chandra can and does. Newer technology often trumps older technology.
True in optics and SOUND.
I am calling bullshit on ALL those 'light' experiments, that have ignored the role of SOUND.

:ugeek: :shock:
Where are Penn and Teller like it is, when you need them?

Mirror mirror on the wall
Who is the biggest fool of all?

Image
What would happen if we replaced the above screens containing the slits, with a WALL of SOUND frequencies traveling perpendicular to the photon or electron?
Or if the slits were opened/closed/altered with SOUND frequencies?

What if we started acknowledging that in a very eerie way, that ALL those experiments conducted till this time, in those rooms/laboratories where these photon/electron particle experiments have taken place, SOUND waves have never been properly accounted for.
:o :o :o

In other words we must acknowledge that those SOUND waves recorded by the Chandra telescope, post 2000, are ever present.
Always have been.
Apparently part of the Cosmic Background Radiation.

SOUND waves with wavelengths so long ... they would approximate or look like a taut straight piece of rope/string as it passes through our dimension/Solar System.
Now you can introduce your chain theory. 8-) 8-)
Along with the Fibonacci sequence and Archimedes' screw.

Image

And the most elegant string theory ever proposed, is a truth instantly recognized.
The most elegant string theory ever devised to explain the creation was developed eons, long ago, it discusses that taunt string that divides the solar system in a divine proportion...
I mean this theory is definitely golden.
Yes, I want to propose that the formula for Phi is in fact an ancient 'String Theory'.
It identifies the formula and can generate a line, a spiral, and a sine wave.
Buried, all over the world, from Pompeii to Troy to Jericho, we can find evidence of this 'String Theory'.
Simple and most Elegant...Phi has been around along time.
A truth that was mixed with fahrenheit 451 in places like Mesoamerica and Africa. :evil:
Think about it.
The chain theory I have seen so thus far explained doesn't mention the thread that runs through it, like a river.

What would happen if we generated very low and very high SOUNDS, and we passed a photon or electron through this field?
Would it pass through undisturbed?
Could we make it bounce like grains of sand ... as illustrated by cymatics.
Could we alter its direction as it passes through the altar or GATE of SOUND that we have created?

Case closed.
So who are the observers that were present in these laboratories, doing the observing?
How many were actually present...were they ALL accounted for?
WAVE / PARTICLE duality is a sham.

And we should ALL be conCERNed about those scientists who are wasting valuable TIME and the illusion MONEY, make believe money that I believe is made better spent helping humanity...
What should be done with the surplus of money that was used to build this technological WHITE Elephant?
Have those scientists build musical instruments.
NOT the doomsday machine...
But that is another thread to itself.
:lol:

Where is the BANG formula that follows the Big One?
Will we all be witness to a man-made version of the BANG?
Eh?
By what method should we 'thread' the needle?

Valhalla

p.s.
what happens to my thesis concerning SOUND and LIGHT when we introduce the following?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sonoluminescence
Last edited by Valhalla on Fri Nov 28, 2008 8:56 am, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
junglelord
Posts: 3693
Joined: Mon Mar 17, 2008 5:39 am
Location: Canada

Re: SOUND declares the DOUBLE SLIT Experiment is a SHAM

Unread post by junglelord » Fri Nov 28, 2008 8:49 am

That is the ratio of Aether Cycles to Quantum Spin.
It produces a sound, this ratio between two spin rotating magnetic field of aether and the related angular momentmum it encapsulates. Good post my friend.
If you only knew the magnificence of the 3, 6 and 9, then you would have a key to the universe.
— Nikola Tesla
Casting Out the Nines from PHI into Indigs reveals the Cosmic Harmonic Code.
— Junglelord.
Knowledge is Structured in Consciouness. Structure and Function Cannot Be Seperated.
— Junglelord

User avatar
bboyer
Posts: 2410
Joined: Thu Mar 13, 2008 10:50 pm
Location: Upland, CA, USA

Re: SOUND declares the DOUBLE SLIT Experiment is a SHAM

Unread post by bboyer » Fri Nov 28, 2008 9:26 am

Valhalla, Cymatics thread. It is actually from mid-2007, but recovered in early 2008 from Google cache-data when the original forum site crashed and we lost all data. It's one of the lengthier ones but may be worth your time to read through. There are a few posts within the thread about sonoluminescence. Also, maybe this 2-page thread that was recovered, Plasma Cavitation?.
There is something beyond our mind which abides in silence within our mind. It is the supreme mystery beyond thought. Let one's mind and one's subtle body rest upon that and not rest on anything else. [---][/---] Maitri Upanishad

Valhalla
Guest

Re: SOUND declares the DOUBLE SLIT Experiment is a SHAM

Unread post by Valhalla » Fri Nov 28, 2008 10:58 am

arc-us wrote:Valhalla, Cymatics thread. It is actually from mid-2007, but recovered in early 2008 from Google cache-data when the original forum site crashed and we lost all data. It's one of the lengthier ones but may be worth your time to read through. There are a few posts within the thread about sonoluminescence. Also, maybe this 2-page thread that was recovered, Plasma Cavitation?.
15 pages of discussion ... not sure I am interested.
Maybe you could give me a 'conclusion', a 'summary' of the thread, its most vital points?

something like...

SOUND frequencies are critical to the creative process, a process some people refer to as evolution and a process some like to call creationism.

Short concise and to the point.

Something simple like that...
What did you conclude arc-us?
Seeing as you have the potential as the moderator and opportunity to edit others' thoughts ... what have you concluded after having read between the lines on this forum?

Valhalla

User avatar
bboyer
Posts: 2410
Joined: Thu Mar 13, 2008 10:50 pm
Location: Upland, CA, USA

Re: SOUND declares the DOUBLE SLIT Experiment is a SHAM

Unread post by bboyer » Fri Nov 28, 2008 11:39 am

My conclusion was, remains, and will always be ... as you so aptly said elsewhere .... "shhhhh."
There is something beyond our mind which abides in silence within our mind. It is the supreme mystery beyond thought. Let one's mind and one's subtle body rest upon that and not rest on anything else. [---][/---] Maitri Upanishad

Valhalla
Guest

Re: SOUND declares the DOUBLE SLIT Experiment is a SHAM

Unread post by Valhalla » Fri Nov 28, 2008 1:08 pm

arc-us wrote:My conclusion was, remains, and will always be ... as you so aptly said elsewhere .... "shhhhh."
everybody go sit in the corner and shut up?
stop being so smart?
put on a spire and be a dunce for a bit?
chill and think about our bad behaviors?

While in the corner study the right angle, and then come up with a new angle to escape your plight?
Come out of the corner with a new attitude?
:lol:

Valhalla

rcglinsk
Posts: 101
Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2008 10:06 pm

Re: SOUND declares the DOUBLE SLIT Experiment is a SHAM

Unread post by rcglinsk » Fri Dec 12, 2008 2:57 pm

Interesting post. I was wondering how one might go about making a "slit" out of sound? Can sound waves be standing waves?

altonhare
Posts: 1212
Joined: Sun Oct 12, 2008 9:54 am
Location: Baltimore
Contact:

Re: SOUND declares the DOUBLE SLIT Experiment is a SHAM

Unread post by altonhare » Fri Dec 12, 2008 4:48 pm

Valhalla wrote:What would happen if we replaced the above screens containing the slits, with a WALL of SOUND frequencies traveling perpendicular to the photon or electron?
Or if the slits were opened/closed/altered with SOUND frequencies?
The light would indeed interact with the "sound" since sound is the motion/vibration of atoms and light indeed interacts with atoms.

Not sure what you mean by opening/closing/altering the slits with "sound frequencies".
Valhalla wrote:The chain theory I have seen so thus far explained doesn't mention the thread that runs through it, like a river.
Chain theory explains the broad, ubiquitous observations of light, gravity, and magnetism. It should be capable of explaining any particular observations, as well, if the details of such observations were well known. Certainly what you are describing seems like the bread and butter of chain theory.
Valhalla wrote:What would happen if we generated very low and very high SOUNDS, and we passed a photon or electron through this field?
Light would certainly interact very differently than an electron. It'd be interesting to see the results of such experiments. They certainly would not "pass through undisturbed" since both light and electrons interact with atoms.
Physicist: This is a pen

Mathematician: It's pi*r2*h

User avatar
junglelord
Posts: 3693
Joined: Mon Mar 17, 2008 5:39 am
Location: Canada

Re: SOUND declares the DOUBLE SLIT Experiment is a SHAM

Unread post by junglelord » Sat Dec 13, 2008 9:30 am

junglelord wrote:Light should be understood as Primary Angular Momentum.

Light is not EM.
Light or the photon is not Electro Magnetic as we are familiar with it. It is a Tempic vibration or loop which has no electric or magnetic field until it hits an atom able to absorb it into its electron shell adding back the EM components of its wave. Light is not bent by a magnetic field or an electric field because it does not have one in itself to be interactive with, it is only bent in a gravity field where we see stars bending the light from objects passing behind them. It is the smallest pure tempic field vibration we normally encounter. Much like the torsion waves we see Protons emitting in the scalar coils, they can not be measured or detected using EM sensitive equipment, until they hit a system designed to move the energy back into the normal EM fields. Light does not loose energy as it propagates, the value of Planks constant shows us that it is a quantum energy packet that does not experience any loss as it travels. Torsion waves also exhibit this quality.

Light can be polarized, it only fits one direction through a narrow slit smaller then its wavelength. It is a flat loop traveling along its edge. This is the same model for tempic waves or torsion fields. The longitudinal wave is moving through the tempic field not the EM fields, an important distinction.


Image

Light becomes an interference pattern only after it interacts, study the two slit experiment to see how this operates. Light is operating inside the one dimensional force at its most basic level of primary spin. It is an alteration of its velocity back and forth as it moves through space. Wilbert Smith got the answer to, what is light?, "It simply is". It is the first possible vibration operating on the prime force of nature the tempic field. Thus the torsion field is also this type of manifestation, completely void of EM. This is why scalar waves may pass right through solid objects such a Faraday cages, if these waves are not responsive to the wavelengths of the matter.

Image

The tempic field receiver. Two coils placed in quadrature will rebuild the electric component of a torsion wave. Only after the Electric field is reestablished will a magnetic field form, from its movement, and we discover all sit at 90 degrees to one another.

Image

The donut now forms around the electric field in motion. Here we end up with the familiar Electric Magnetic and Motion vectors appearing in Electronics, only we have created them from the prime force outwards and included their correct spin angles to explain light polarization and torsion fields. This model shows us what we have come to call Tempic field, Torsion field, Motion in electric motors, and Light photons are all manifestations of the same basic force, the prime field of nature. Although they all may interact with EM under correct conditions they are not of themselves EM.

It should become apparent due to the nature of matter, that if we could succeed at pushing matter up to its local light speed, it would now be moving along its torsion vector equally as fast as it is moving in its circle pattern, and the circles would never complete as spin. It would become spread out into a stream of energy with nothing that is recognizable to anyone observing it. The solution is to increase its' light speed constant so it can now make more rotations, moving it through density, this requires a tempic field manipulation.


Gravity
Gravity was explained by Wilbert Smith as well, but not comprehensible until one grasps the tempic field. Gravity and the Electric field are composed of the same two vector forces, tempic and electric fields setting at 90 degrees to one another, and thus both offer a distance squared force. Electric force projects along its electric vector which has a gradient or a modulation and carries a constant tempic field along with it that is relatively unchanging at 90 degrees. Gravity has a relatively constant electric field but its tempic field contains a gradient or modulation, and thus it is able to effect light which travels the tempic field. The Electric field gradient is not known to alter the path of light and therein lies the difference.

Collapsing the Torsion field:
When we observe the work of John Hutchison, levitating a cannon ball using 5 EM instruments, we realize that the forces of the tempic field can be altered. What is happening may not be clear to most and seems like magic to be feared, but the explanation is really very straight forwards from the field forces models already commonly in place if one can make the leap to the one dimensional field force, or Torsion to realize its true nature.
http://magnetism.otc.co.nz/FieldForces.htm
If you only knew the magnificence of the 3, 6 and 9, then you would have a key to the universe.
— Nikola Tesla
Casting Out the Nines from PHI into Indigs reveals the Cosmic Harmonic Code.
— Junglelord.
Knowledge is Structured in Consciouness. Structure and Function Cannot Be Seperated.
— Junglelord

altonhare
Posts: 1212
Joined: Sun Oct 12, 2008 9:54 am
Location: Baltimore
Contact:

Re: SOUND declares the DOUBLE SLIT Experiment is a SHAM

Unread post by altonhare » Thu Dec 18, 2008 5:02 pm

http://magnetism.otc.co.nz/FieldForces.htm wrote:It is a Tempic vibration or loop which has no electric or magnetic field until it hits an atom able to absorb it into its electron shell adding back the EM components of its wave
You're saying light is both a something (a loop) and what something does (a vibration). This seems unscientific. If A can be B when it's convenient and C when it's convenient, surely we can "explain" anything.

How does an electron shell "absorb" a loop? If they are both distinct, separate objects, how do they suddenly become one? In our everyday experience what we think of as absorption is not two things literally melding into one, but rather one thing (like water) moves from one location to another location, the latter of which is near to the constituents of another thing (like a rag).

Assuming this absorption can happen, why would the shell "add back" something, especially components of a wave, which itself is a verb. What is the nature of this entity called "electron shell" that causes it to do what you call "adding EM components"?
http://magnetism.otc.co.nz/FieldForces.htm wrote:It is a flat loop traveling along its edge.
How does it make sense to say it "travels along its edge"? If I turn my head, suddenly it is "traveling along its side". Is the author trying to say there is some reference object such that the loops of light always travel with an orientation relative to this object such that their edge is pointed at this object?
Physicist: This is a pen

Mathematician: It's pi*r2*h

Locked

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 17 guests