Are the planets growing?

Beyond the boundaries of established science an avalanche of exotic ideas compete for our attention. Experts tell us that these ideas should not be permitted to take up the time of working scientists, and for the most part they are surely correct. But what about the gems in the rubble pile? By what ground-rules might we bring extraordinary new possibilities to light?

Moderators: MGmirkin, bboyer

Re: Are the planets growing?

Unread postby rickard » Sun Dec 03, 2017 2:33 pm

allynh wrote:Sadly, topics get moved and combined, as you will see when you read this thread. HA!

All of the questions you could ask have already been answered, just read the thread and you will see.

What do you know about which questions i could ask?
rickard
 
Posts: 25
Joined: Tue Oct 31, 2017 1:19 pm

Re: Are the planets growing?

Unread postby allynh » Thu Dec 07, 2017 2:20 pm

Up thread I addressed the fatal flaws of Flat Earth Theory. Now I found this video showing what I was talking about.

Is Earth Actually Flat?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VNqNnUJVcVs

The video only falls apart at about 7:00 minutes when he brings in the nonsense of time dilation shrinking distance. To get so much right, then trip up at the end. Oh, well.

As I said up thread, I'm not interested in the conspiracy theory Flat Earth people use to hide the fact that it doesn't work, so let's not go there. HA!
allynh
 
Posts: 826
Joined: Fri Aug 22, 2008 5:51 pm

Re: Are the planets growing?

Unread postby rickard » Wed Dec 13, 2017 8:16 am

Flat Earth Theory has followers all around the globe 8-)
rickard
 
Posts: 25
Joined: Tue Oct 31, 2017 1:19 pm

Trying to add up the clues - connecting the dots

Unread postby RoatanBill » Tue Dec 26, 2017 1:22 pm

EU theory upsets lots of people. Expanding earth and earth crust displacement also illicit strong feelings. The problem with the very existence of the dinosaurs, some with their long necks and the structural problems that entails given today's gravity adds another layer of doubt about what consensus science has to offer.

The iridium layer is a fact. It was supposedly deposited as the result of one event, and consequently defines the surface of the earth at that time. It has occurred to me to ask where did all the material above that layer come from? I specifically asked that of an AskAGeologist web site and never got a straight answer in multiple emails.

Energy and matter are theoretically interchangeable. EU theory has energy entering earth continuously via the poles and I'm wondering if that energy isn't responsible for creating the matter that is expanding the earth imperceptibly on the human time scale. Could new matter be expanding the earth and consequently could rewinding the clock logically deduce a smaller earth where gravity was a fraction of today's value to allow the dinosaurs size to be reasonable under their gravity conditions? Could a slowly accreting earth cause an instability that would be rectified by earth crust displacement that would sling the mass towards the equator and help explain ancient flash frozen beasts with warm weather plant material in their stomachs?
RoatanBill
 
Posts: 1
Joined: Thu Dec 14, 2017 11:24 am
Location: Roatan island

Re: Are the planets growing?

Unread postby perpetual motion » Tue Dec 26, 2017 9:32 pm

'energy that is entering earth continuously via the poles is responsible for creating the matter that is expanding the earth imperceptibly on the human time scale'. Could new matter be expanding the earth? I believe that this could very well be a logical answer. What is flying around in space is the very
foundation of everything that is.
perpetual motion
 
Posts: 138
Joined: Mon Mar 24, 2008 9:04 pm

Previous

Return to New Insights and Mad Ideas

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests